Unfavorable Maternal Parents From History

Unfavorable Maternal Parents From History

Khalid Elhassan - August 21, 2019

Unfavorable Maternal Parents From History
Byzantine gold solidus featuring Empress Irene. Wikimedia

16. Irene and Icons

Icons’ opponents, known as Iconoclasts, reasoned that Muslims had been successful because they strictly obeyed the Second Commandment’s prohibition of graven images. In 711, the year the Muslims invaded Spain, a new emperor, Leo the Isaurian, ascended the throne in Constantinople. A few years later, the Muslim Caliph ordered the destruction of every Christian image in the Islamic world: every statue, mosaic, and painting, of Jesus, Mary, and the saints. Christians appealed to Leo for help, but his response astonished many: he decided to emulate the Caliph, and destroy every Christian icon in his own empire as well.

Leo’s agents spread throughout what was left of the Byzantine Empire, invading churches to root out and destroy images and icons. That kicked off half a century of Iconoclasm, as Leo’s son and successor, Constantine V, went about smashing icons as enthusiastically as his dad had. However, while Iconoclasm had plenty of support, it also had plenty of opposition: many loved their icons, and hated Iconoclasts. One such opponent was Emperor Constantine V’s daughter-in-law, Irene of Athens. She bided her time until the moment came for her to undo Iconoclasm. Unfortunately, that also entailed undoing her own son.

Advertisement